| There is a way to describe photons such that everything in the universe must necessarily be a natural consequence of photonic interaction. Photons of this flavor agree with experiment and behave in accord with most of the rules of quantum physics but they depart from the most cherished notion of that science and avoid its unreasonable ideas. These photons consist of saturated points of amplitude in fields of force that permeate all the fabric of space. | ||||||||||||
| Our receipe for building this universe begins with space and time in the none-varying classic sense. Then we mix in electromagnetic change and stir gently. | ||||||||||||
Consider that the seat of the electromagnetic field is the empty space.
| ||||||||||||
| Electric change creates magnetic fields and magnetic change creates electric fields. The fields exist as planes situated ninety degrees from each other with the edge of the planes facing the direction of travel. Points of maximum rate of change and maximum amplitude exist where the two planes cross. This is the classical photon model of the 20th century. It is not a particle as in Quantum Theory. It looks like a particle because of its electromagnetically saturated points of maximum amplitude. | ||||||||||||
Saturation amplitude of photon points is a universal constant of space.
Short-wave-length photons have more energy but since they exist for
less time and saturate at the same amplitude their energy-time is the
same as that of photons with longer wave length. Because of this all
photons exist as 6.626075 x 10-34 Joule-seconds worth of potential
energy-time.[1] Planck's constant thus derives from the more basic constant amplitude of photons.
| ||||||||||||
When a point reaches saturation, it begins immediately to change back
and its point of saturation moves forward through space at its natural
speed of light. This stops the
change that had been occurring in points to the side so they do not
reach saturation but begin immediately to follow the first point's new
direction of change. The first point continues this function going all
the way through zero amplitude to saturation in the opposite polarity
and back to zero again. Students of math will recognize this kind of
change as a sine function and the resulting amplitude fluctuation as a
sinusoidal wave form. [Notice that the point of saturation is a constant amplitude. This obvious fact is not
generally dwelled upon, but it is the key to understanding the true cause of gravity.]
| ||||||||||||
At a very small distance away from a point's central path, change is so
weak that it cannot take [a very noticable] part in the electric or
magnetic interactions
of particles. Since it can't interact, it is almost invisible to mass.
It is not quite invisible, however. No matter how minute this small
change becomes it still contributes toward the saturation amplitude
that any point in space may reach. [ This is very important. That contribution toward saturation amplitude is the cause of
gravity.]
| ||||||||||||
|
This action forms two point-like ripples. They exist as a wave of
electric and magnetic amplitude that normally moves through space in a
straight line at about 300 million meters per second. Maxwell's
equations thus describe quantum-governed photons that exist as points
even though he didn't know about the quantum nature of the universe. | ||||||||||||
Since the seat of the field is the empty space, points in space must
act independently and always respond to any change in adjacent points.
| ||||||||||||
|
For more than half of the twentieth century, scientists worked under
the misconception that all electromagnetic phenomena were symmetric.
Then they found that the speed of light in certain optical media
changed with light intensity. In these media the principle of
superposition[3] was violated, light could alter its frequency going
from red to blue, and light could control light; photons did interact.
(Saleh and Teich) | ||||||||||||
|
One of the most interesting devices to come from this new science was
the "Conjugate mirror." When light strikes this mirror, it does not
reflect away at an angle as light does from an ordinary mirror. Light
reflects back exactly toward the direction from which it came. A laser
weapon firing at this device would destroy itself. The beam would
reflect back to its source no matter the angle that the beam struck the
mirror. | ||||||||||||
|
The big winner, however, was wave-guide technology. Scientists were
able to design optic cable so well that fifty thousand simultaneous
voice transmissions could travel thousands of miles on a hair-thin
fiber. This was not easy. Hair-thin cable had to be developed such that
wave packets traveled faster in outer layers than in the most central
strand so that when a wave packet strayed outward, its faster speed
would bend it inward again. Today, conjugate mirrors are common in
optic laboratories and these cables link all the major cities of the
world. | ||||||||||||
|
The success of this science of non-linear optics effectively destroyed
any hope that quantum mechanics could define all interactions of mass
with the concept of particle transfer on a scale larger than
leptons. [ sub-atomic particles ]
Scientists gradually accepted the notion that at the most elementary
level, particles and waves were the same. Photons did not exist as
either. They only existed as a probability potential to become one or
the other. Statistical probability became King of Quantum physics. | ||||||||||||
| We can now abandon the concept of particles altogether as Einstein wanted to do with his unified field theory. When we do, the non-linear phenomena observed in recent times must necessarily be as we see it to be given the concept of photon structure defined here. Photons must interact with other photons. Reasoning shows that they must, observations show that they do, and successful enterprise shows the result of accepting this reality. | ||||||||||||
| There can be no doubt that photons do interact with each other, but we normally don't notice it because the distance between photons is usually very great compared to the size of their saturated points. When two photons move in very close proximity, however, electric and magnetic interaction can bend the path of both. | ||||||||||||
|
Factors such as phase angle, passing distance, polarity of phase,
polarization of fields, and many others make a prediction of the exact
behavior of ordinary-wild light impossible. Its behavior can only be
described statistically. Laser light is less wild, however. Its photons
line up end to end and side to side in a coherent fashion. Using this,
scientists have developed a rich set of equations in addition to
Maxwell's that define the behavior of photons. (Saleh and Teich) | ||||||||||||
| When photons move in a straight line, negative change immediately follows positive change--or vice versa--so that space is electrically neutral after the photon passes. In the bent path of a photon this does not happen. The fields are not completely canceled in the bend. There is a remaining electric charge that moves out from the bend radius at the speed of light diminishing in amplitude as the square of distance. [ This fact has avoided publication by the leading journals. It needs to be proven by experiment. We propose a $1,000,000 prize be awarded. ] | ||||||||||||
The photon's path may bend so that a negative electric field remains or
it may bend so that a
At first it may seem that the requirement of an exact frequency and bend radius would make this a rare event. It is not, however, because feedback from the field is not powerful enough to sustain a bend radius. As a result, any time the original bend is tighter than the photon's wave length the photon must uncurl through its exact wavelength. At its wave-length circumference it finds resonance and that adds the required force to trap an electron's photon in a stable loop.
When the frequency is too great for even a spiral loop to form at 2.4 x 10-10 centimeters, tighter loops
The source of the strong nuclear interaction, for example, is the forces on the circumference of the outer shells of protons and neutrons. When a proton's outer shell merges through that of another proton its outer shell can approach the next-to-outer shell of the other. The total of the forces of all shells then in contact calculates to be that of the measured nuclear forces. [ The square root of the sums of the forces calculates to the value of the measured nuclear forces. ]
Photons that comprise mass emit fields just as do photons free in space. These fields are strongest in and around massive objects and diminish with the square of distance away from them. As described above, central points in photons always reach saturation and are not able to increase beyond that. When these points pass through fields from other photons the fields contribute toward this saturation amplitude. Points that are changing toward saturation must then reach it at an offset toward increasing field strength. Because of this, all photons including those that comprise mass, must experience a slight acceleration toward other massive objects. [ Photonic gravity: Brown style; Wagman style ]
Photon theory does not demand or predict that a neutrino particle exists. In fact the concept of the neutrino is somewhat of a problem. Scientists who advocate photon theory have been unable to show how to build a neutral phase-locked shell out of a single photon. There is a possibility in photon theory that the neutrino could be a spin polerized photon. The Quantum theories also have a problem with the neutrino. Scientists could not observe these [ neutrino ] particles directly so they reasoned that they could observe them through their by products. In the case of neutrinos, the by products were photon signatures of electron-positron annihilation. A passing neutrino would interact with a proton changing it to a neutron and releasing a positron. The positron would be annihilated by an electron and the resulting photons could be observed. Clyde L. Cowan and Frederick Reines first conducted this experiment successfully in 1957, but there was a problem that still remains. There was no a-priori reason that the observed photons must have come from the set of circumstances imagined, and more recent experiments have failed to detect the required neutrons that should be created in the process.[6] The case for quarks is even less convincing. Scientists can only observe them through by products of very short-lived massive particles that they assume are created by quark decay. There are so many short-lived massive particles that some must fit the required mass range whether quarks exist or not.
This photonic universe must necessarily exist in non-varying space and time in the classic-common sense. [ Classic Spact-Time ] All massive objects are made of photons that move at the constant speed of light. Because of this, they must necessarily experience space and time differently when the mass is moving. The phenomenon of relativity is the natural result of the construct of mass and is not a property of space or time. [7] When we develop equations to predict how this kind of mass must change with movement we find that we have reproduced equations first developed by H. A. Lorentz at the turn of the twentieth century. His "Lorentz transformations" accurately describe the observed changes in mass moving in different inertial frames of reference. Photons are thus at the root of all things and this may seem much different from the standard-model universe. It is not so much different, however. Einstein's theory of relativity still holds, for example, and his equations still work to describe observed changes in massive objects in motion. We changed only the assumptions that were at odds with reasonable cause. So now we have described photons that pass all tests of reality that we can yet devise. If they do exist in space and time, these photons are the underlying framework for the universe and our picture of it is much more clear. Although we may never be completely convinced that our universe exists as such, we can never deny the possibility that it might. Until some new discovery shoots it down, the photonic theory of everything must stand as the most simple, reasonable, and complete of all such theories yet advanced. [1]Vernon Brown, "How Come the Quantum," Feb. Photonics, Cabot Arkansas, 1994. This work shows that it is a simple a-priori mathematical reality that this is so. [2]Bahaa E. A. Saleh and Malvin Carl Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, New York, 1991. [3]The principle of superposition should hold because the wave equation is linear. The principle states that if u1(r,t) and u2(r,t) represent optical waves, then u(r,t) = u1(r,t) + u2(r,t) also represents a possible optical wave. [4]Vernon Brown, "Square of the Shells Rule," Photonics, Cabot Arkansas, 1991. Electron mass is .51099906 MeV yielding a frequency of 1.2344 x 1020 HZ, a wavelength of 2.4286 x 10-10 centimeters, a loop diameter of 7.7306 x 10-11 centimeters, and one electron force at its circumference. Shell one mass is 1.303008 MeV yielding a frequency of 3.1476 x 1020 HZ, a wavelength of 9.5243 x 10-11 centimeters, a loop diameter of 3.0317 x 10-11 centimeters, and 2.5499 electron forces at its circumference. Shell 2 mass is 3.3225 MeV, yielding a frequency of 8.0262 x 1020 HZ, a wavelength of 3.735 x 10-11 centimeters, a loop diameter of 1.1889 x 10-11 centimeters, and 6.5021 electron forces at its circumference. Shell 3 mass is 21.6036 MeV, yielding a frequency of 5.2187 x 1021 HZ, a wavelength of 5.7445 x 10-12 centimeters, a loop diameter of 1.8285 x 10-12 centimeters, and 42.2773 electron forces at its circumference. Shell 4 mass is 913.3460 MeV, yielding a frequency of 2.2063 x 1023 HZ, a wavelength of 1.3587 x 10-13 centimeters, a loop diameter of 4.3251 x 10-14 centimeters, and 1787.3732 electron forces at its circumference. [5]Vernon Brown, "Hofstadters Shells Revisited," Photonics, Cabot Arkansas, 1994. [6]Samuel Devons, "Neutrino," Grolier Electronic Encyclopedia, New York, 1993. [7]Albert Einstein, "Development of Our Conception of the Nature and Constitution of Radiation," Physikalische Zeitschrift 22, 1909. Translated by Christian Holm. Jefferson Hane Weaver, The World of Physics, VOL. II, New York, 1987. Einstein discussed this with H. Ziegler, Max Planck, and Stark. |