Evidence For |
Just Links |
Evidence Against |




Source Code
Photon-Only Universe
Audio
The Birds And Bees
by
The physical laws of nature that exist today do not permit a universe like the one that established theory describes. Established theory describes a period of expansion during which time, the physical laws of nature were different than they are now. This is one clue that established theory may be wrong. Contrary to what we are taught, our universe seems to be a stable, self replicating, recycling, and mature organization of galaxies that has existed forever and will continue to exist forever more. Among the clues are hydrogen clouds spaced apart today about as much as they were many billions of years ago. If the universe is expanding these clouds should have been closer together in the past. We can see evidence of this spacing by observing the hydrogen lines in the spectra of distant objects. Each time light passes through a hydrogen cloud, an absorption line appears in the spectra. Studied for years, these spectra lines are known as the Lyman Alpha Forest. They show that the universe today looks just like it did in the past. We can predict, then, that there exists these same spectra in radio waves shifted far outside the visible range. In fact, these spectra should exist at wave lengths as low in frequency as we can detect. When found, their existence will be another proof that our galaxy is a mature and stable beast. Since it has existed forever, it must self-replicate, and reproduce itself over and over. We see evidence of this in the center of all galaxies. Massive objects there chew up matter by slinging it around at near light speed and stripping it of its electrons. This leaves charged ions moving at near-light-speed. This creates massive electric and magnetic fields that destabilize nucleons which decay into gamma radiation. Galactic spin aligns the electric and magnetic fields such that most of the radiation and ionic particles spew out perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy. This is in line with observed jets of plasma and gamma radiation we see in most galaxies. So, galaxies are huge recycling machines that accumulate matter and convert it back into energy. The jets of plasma and gamma radiation interact in free space and become matter again. We know the mechanism by which this happens because we observe it in particle accelerators. The particle zoo downstream does not come out of the colliding particles. Most of the stuff comes out of the energy itself. As beautiful as supersymmetry is, the unstable particles have nothing to do with the make up of matter. We know that when matter becomes energy, it does not lose its gravitational characteristics. It still creates gravity, and gravity still attracts it. If you accept the equations of General Relativity, you must accept the fact that energy behaves this way. It is built in to the equations. There is a cosmic microwave background radiation that comes at us from all directions. This background is in a state of motion relative to us and it is the same throughout the universe. We can say then, that the enertial frame of reference of the cosmic microwave background radiation is special. Since this special frame of reference is the same throughout the universe, we can always measure our progress through it.
There is lots of evidence that this is so.
We find when we do this, that nothing much changes. The arithmetic is all the same. But, there is one big difference. Now we know that all material things must distort with motion and this is observed as Relativity phenomena. H. Ziegler argued this point with Einstein and Planck at the turn of the twentieth century. It is not possible to model the formation of a black hole. Relativity phenomena gets in the way. In such a model, particles accelerate in a gravity field. The equation for acceleration contains time as an element. As gravity increases time slows due to relativity. The time element in the acceleration equation slows acceleration. The supposed gravitational singularity can not possibly be reached. Gravity affects gravity the same as gravity affects time. We find that a universe made only of light does not allow variable space-time. We must have some other mechanism to produce galactic red shift. Something similar to tired light must happen. Light must loose energy as it ages. Although tired-light theories are subjected to much ridicule, there is no evidence that some form of it is not reality. One proof offered against the so-called tired light theories is the observed time dilation of 1A Super Novas. There is an easy explanation for this and it is testable. Perhaps it is not time dialation that we observe. Different frequencies of light move at different speeds through transparent media. We see this in a prism for example. High frequencies move more slowly and so are bent more to produce the familiar spectrum effect. Space is not completely empty. It is a transparent medium. Frequencies of light from the 1A Super Novas spread out and arrive over a longer time. First we see the red burst. It gradually changes toward the blue. This change in color as the Super Nova ages has been documented. With the self-replicating part explained, we now move to the age part. Is there any evidence outside the red shift that suggests a Big Bang? We might look for distant stars that consist only of the first elements to congeal. Such stars are called, "first generation stars." We find that no first generation star has ever been observed. We might look for evidence that the most distant galaxies seem to be young relative to those close up. We find no such evidence. Galaxies all seem the same through out the visible universe. We could go on and on, but just to make things short, there is no evidence other than the red shift in light that the Big Bang ever happened. Wouldn't it be a hoot if the universe actually does exist as we describe it here. There is no evidence that the universe is not that way. Yet, almost every modern theory ignores the possibility that it might be that way. And, if it is that way, then almost every established theory is wrong. Many known facts are independent variables that agree to the extended decimal. The possibility that all of these could be mere circumstance is very remote. Consider this while noting that there is no evidence that the universe is not so comprised. |
Quark Stripper
|
Relativity
|
One Solution
|
Why Does Squaring
|
Welcome To
|
Nature behaves as if
|
Cause And Effect
|