Why Even Bother
by
It continues to amaze me that students of physics hold on so tight to the concepts of quantum mechanics. Many of its founding fathers abandoned it. Some, such as Irwin Schrodinger, Albert Einstein, and others actually hated it and warned of being misled by its concepts. Nature screams out with its reality; yet, those smitten with Quantumania ignore nature's indicators.
If the consequences of such deliberate ignorance of nature's construct were
not so grave, we could just ignore the physics community and let them dream
Although Albert Einstein was a major critic of Quantum Mechanics, I hold him largely responsible for its false acceptance. When Einstein-Minkowski Spacetime was accepted, we lost the main indicator of nature's construct. By accepting Einstein's version of Spacetime, the true logical path to nature's construct is lost. Before the acceptance of Einstein-Minkowski Spacetime, the phenomena of relativity was logically explained by assuming that the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality was the electromagnetic field. At the turn of the twentieth century, most scientists reasoned that this was the final fact of nature. Henry Poincare, Hendric Antoon Lorentz, and George FitzGerald wrote out the equations that described the contortions of massive objects due to movement. The postulate that demanded the equations was that: "the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field." And as was generally known at the time, space and time were fixed in the classical sense. All of the distortions of relativity phenomena were due to distortions of the objects themselves and not of space and time. The distortions happened because the objects consisted only of constituents that must move at the invariant speed of light. We must remember that the experimental results known at the time produced only a small portion of the phenomena that the Lorentz Equations predicted. It was only by forcing reality to fit that postulate that these great thinkers could produce the equations that described relativity phenomena. These equations passed all tests of the last hundred years. They show the cause of the phenomena of relativity. The cause is that the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality moves at the constant speed of light in flat Spacetime. After the acceptance of Einstein-Minkowski Spacetime, relativity phenomena could be attributed to a variance in space and time itself. The variance was not limited to to the distortions of massive objects as it was with the Lorentz-FitzGerald explanation. Thus, Einstein produced the concept that condemned physical science to suffer through the period of dark ages that we call the Quantumania times. During these times no great discoveries are possible. Physical science has lost its way. | |
|
Potential Potential
When an electric motor turns its armature some work is done. If we hold
the armature so as to cause friction, more work is done than when the armature
turns free. We say that this work action is conveyed from the motor's
internal windings to the armature by the exchange of photons. If we look
only at the energy flow in the motor's windings and have no other knowledge
of the armature, we can determine the armature's load by the amount of energy flow in the windings.
| |
More Visualization Tools
| |
|
The ultimate photon theory must provide a proof that everything in the universe can be described in terms of Maxwell's partial differential equations. There can be some modifications such as those proposed by Dr. Robert Kemp. The task can then be reduced down to just two more additions. There needs to be a function that quantifies an imbalance in the photon's electromagnetic fields whenever the photon's path is bent. This must result in an electric charge that is positive feedback to the photon so that it bends the path more in the same direction. The other function must be one that quantifies resonance in terms of its holding force when the bend radius of the photon places one wavelength inside a circumference. The combination of the charge produced by the positive feedback and the force of resonance must be just right to hold the photon in the circle pattern. Parts of the problem are already defined. We know the result. An electron is created. This gives us the circumference of the pattern and the electric charge value associated with that amount of curve. The circumference is equal to the wavelength of the electron. The electric charge is equal to the charge of the electron. There should be a way to normalize that charge/curve ratio so that the amount of charge associated with any curve can be calculated. Then Maxwell's equations must be modified to accommodate the two added forces. So modified, Maxwell's equations can describe everything in the universe. So the task is to show how a gamma ray photon is curled into an electron.
Below is a simplified schematic of a neutron composed of four shells. Each
shell is one photon of wave length equal to the circumference. This model is produced
by the software linked below.
|
|
Shell Dynamics
|
Two protons can smash together with such force that their outside shells pass through each other until the middle shells of each are trapped inside the negative inside layer of the outside shells. |
This Shell One would be the outside shell of the Neutron. Without this shell, the Neutron is exactly the same as the proton. The strength of the electric charge at the circumference of this shell is 2.5 times as strong as the strength of the electric charge at the electron's electromagnetic circumference. Seen from the outside, the charge of this outer shell of the neutron is negative. Seen from the inside, it is positive.
We have made computer models of Hofstadter's Shells. Using the C++ programming language, we made a class structure for Electrons, Neutrons, and Protons. We do not have the movement Methods for the classes but we know such Methods are possible. We know the characteristics of the Methods from what Nature itself shows us.
by
Vernon Brown
June 25 2008
The phenomena of relativity in nature is such overwhelming evidence that our tendency is to look no further. But there is much more evidence. If the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field, there will be evidence of that everywhere we look. And conversely there will be no irrefutable evidence to the contrary. We maintain that is the case and offer this evidence that it is the case.
The first thing most folks list as evidence to the contrary is that the four forces of nature are distinctly different. But as we have shown in Photon Theory, it is quite easy to develop consistent unification theories using known electromagnetic phenomena. The four forces are simply different manifestations of electromagnetic phenomena. Professor Willis Thompson of San Diego State University shows that quiet easily.
by
Vernon Brown
June 21, 2008
By November 5th 1991 I had concluded that the advocates of a completely electromagnetic universe were probably correct. Quantum Mechanics, admittedly the most successful theory yet conceived, was non-the-less wrong at its philosophical foundation. All of the elementary particles were simple constructs of electromagnetic energy.
At first I thought I had stumbled upon some great truth, but then after several years researching the old texts and documents squirreled away by scientists of the early 20th century, I saw that this was an old idea. I saw mention in some of Einstein's published memos that James Clerk Maxwell, Lorentz, and Poincare worked on that assumption, leading to The Lorentz_ether_theory. There was also evidence that Einstein himself considered the electromagnetic field as the basis of his unification theory. Einstein's words.
I wrote a computer program to see how a Neutron could be constructed from a photon's components. It turned out to work quite well. Simply curl photons into tight one-wavelength loops and sandwich them together in four shells. The mass of each shell increases exponentially from the outer to inner shell.
Source Code For Neutron Model
My Library Source |
SDL Library Source
Output of the original compiled program:
Screenshot of the current animated neutron program:
The hash marks represent electric charge amplitude and polarity. Blue is negative and red is positive. The charge amplitude completes one cycle during one wave length. This causes the same polarity to remain on the outside of the pattern all the way around the loop. Peak amplitude rotates around the loop at the speed of light. In the program this rotation is counter-clockwise. In real life, the rotation could be either way and there would probably be a composite flat-wise rotation of the pattern to form a shell structure. This pattern agrees very well with hadron spectra experiments documented in "Guage Theories in Particle Physics", by Aitchison & Hey. It is part of the "Graduate Student Series in Physics", at the University of Sussex.
This was proof to me that nuclear particles could be constructed of electromagnetic fields alone. I set about to construct them. At first came the electron. It would be the largest of the particles. I wrote another little program to see how a proton and neutron might be composed of these curled up photons.
The simple computer program source code:
The Program Itself
Download via the link, or simply copy and paste the source code below for the Square-of-the-Shells calculator. It is written in ANSII compliant C code and will compile with the Open Source C compiler that ships with Fedora 9 Linux. The latest Windows compilers should also work.
on in their unnatural world. But the consequences are truly grave. While we
are on the present path, no great discoveries are possible. All our bright
young students of physics are condemned to fail in their efforts to advance
the understanding of nature's ways.
Now, lets construct a motor so that its armature is some distance away
from the driving force of the windings. We expect a speed-of-light
delay between action at the windings and action at the armature. We do see this
speed-of-light delay. We do not expect to see a delay of twice the speed
of light. We always see exactly the speed of light delay between the source
of an action and the place where the action manifests itself.
