A Fundamental Theory
Predicts Relativity

Relativity phenomena is an all-invasive part of all material things. It must therefore be present at the most fundamental beginnings of nature's construct. We know how to describe nature to make this so. When we describe nature in this certain way, relativity phenomena is predicted and indeed, demanded by nature's construct. We know of no other way to describe the most fundamental constituents of nature so that relativity phenomena is predicted.

In order to demand relativity phenomena every physical reality in the universe must be composed of electromagnetic fields. It must be composed of that alone. Adding any other constituent breaks the arithmetic so that relativity phenomena is no longer predicted to be as it is observed to be.

When we fail to accept this most fundamental reality we are forced to construct weird and unnatural entities and invent a whole unreal physics that can not even predict the existence of mass. It does not predict relativity phenomena, and indeed, relativity phenomena is an extra unnatural add-on.

Any fundamental theory that fails to demand relativity phenomena at its very core, can not be what is real in nature. The reason it can not be real is that we easily observe that relativity phenomena is real and it is present in every physical reality that we know about.

So the first question about any fundamental theory should be: How does this theory demand the existence of Relativity Phenomena? Because we can know with certainty that if the theory does not demand relativity phenomena it is unnatural and does not represent reality. This is how we know that although the theory predicts reality with great precision, the most fundamental idea behind Quantum Theory is wrong.